Should we redefine ‘sustainability’ and can it still have substance in its objectives? The answer could be in redefining sustainability as ‘Smart buildings’. The redefine would be sustainability as a synonymic with smaller environmental footprints, and more importantly, tools to monitor and verify the impact of technology implementation in economic terms. In this way actions could translate actions into economic benefits. The cost benefit test that is linked to sustainability in this way would tick most boxes (output become outcomes – in the policy context) and these dollars makes the sustainability message all the way to the top line enterprise decision makers.
In a post published to IDC Energy Insights’ Smart Building Strategies Program. It was said: “This new level of transparency and measurability will reshape the future of sustainability and generate radical efficiency.” More information about this program and report can be found here: http://www.idc-ei.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=EI238359#.UMe58uS7P3o
In a similar discussion at a meeting with Cogent in Sydney during December 2012, it was said:
We have the NABERS program (NABERS is an Australian national rating system that measures the environmental performance of Australian buildings, tenancies and homes. Put simply, NABERS measures the energy efficiency, water usage, waste management and indoor environment quality of a building or tenancy and its impact on the environment),
America has LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and is a voluntary, consensus-based, market-driven program that provides third-party verification of green buildings), and
We both have a comprehensive Energy Star (The Energy Star program was developed by John S. Hoffman, inventor of the Green Programs at EPA, working closely with the IT industry, and implemented by Cathy Zoi and Brian Johnson. The program was intended to be part of a series of voluntary programs, such as Green Lights and the Methane Programs, that would demonstrate the potential for profit in reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gases by power plants. Initiated as a voluntary labeling program designed to identify and promote energy efficient products).
While much of this discussion was on water and energy efficiency and the application of embedded generation the dilemma of future fuel sourcing which includes the policies that affect the price is that prices will rise and it will be as much the fault of intervention as the demand curve. What was agreed was that the next generation of ‘smart’ requires changes in rules and applications to be value for owners and operators. It is also in context the means to mitigate litigious actions.
Then on 27 December 2012, we heard of the resignation of:
|The Obama administration’s chief environmental watchdog, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, is stepping down after a nearly four-year tenure marked by high-profile brawls over global…|
Prior to the 27 December 2012 announcement the IDC EI report said “media attention has fueled heated debate around the inferior energy performance of some certified LEED buildings. While USGBC and its LEED certification program have been very successful in bringing efficiency and sustainability front and center in corporate consciousness, these programs do not prescribe actions to ensure ongoing efficiency. The next step is determining what will best promote ongoing efficiency and superior building performance.
VERGE at Greenbuild, the two day launch of this year’s USGBC annual conference, tackled the continuous improvement challenge head on. The big takeaway is that the adoption of new data-driven technology can deliver ongoing efficiency and sustainability with unprecedented success. Data, however, is only as transformative as the tools that make it actionable. If data is to define the future of sustainability, then the future of information technology will define how facilities become radically efficient — true smart buildings. IDC’s four pillars of the future of IT are the answer to call for radical efficiency. Social business, big data analytics, cloud computing and mobility will be the IT enablers for the new future of sustainability”.
Co2Land org encapsulates in brief these findings:
1. Social business can accelerate the transformation of facilities into smart buildings. Improving practices, tactics and strategies. “These platforms are also venues to showcase the benefits of technology implementation and successes”.
2. Big data analytics. Integrate new generation technologies and system architectures as reliable valuable grid resources. Thereby, the design will extract value from very large volumes of a wide variety of data. These tools focus on automated demand response programs.
3. Cloud computing will be an important enabler of scaling smart buildings through the cost effective and flexible delivery of essential analytics and data management tools.
4. Mobility will ensure facilities managers adopt and use smart building solutions.
Co2Land org see the defining of sustainable this way carries the promise as ‘Smart buildings’ generate business value for owners, occupants, and utilities through next-generation IT architecture utilizing social business, cloud computing, big data analytics, and mobility. Our other reference included SMART the two way difference!( Posted on November 25, 2012 by co2land ).
We should also expect 2013 to be a year of great change and challenges with or without GFC II.